The fact sheets will be used in court to determine whether Mylan Pharmaceuticals of West Virginia, Actavis US and DUL Laboratories misrepresented Digitek as safe and whether physicians and patients relied on those “misrepresentations and deceptions” in choosing to use the heart medicine.

Digitek is used in the treatment of various heart conditions such as atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter and heart failure. In 2008, the FDA issued an alert to the public of a recall of Digitek, after it was found that some tablets had been released at double the thickness, which were thought to contain double the active ingredient. As a result, some patients experienced digoxin toxicity, which can result in life-threatening complications.

The lawsuit argues that, “Plaintiffs have sustained severe physical injuries and/or death, severe emotional distress, mental anguish, economic losses and other damages for which they are entitled to compensatory and equitable damages.”

The fact sheets require plaintiffs to detail 10 years of medical history including the names of every doctor who saw them, every hospital that admitted them and every pharmacy that dispensed medications to them, as well as providing full disclosure for psychological disorders, substances abuse and acquired immune deficiency syndrome. They also are required to list all drugs they have taken and list possible side effects, complete a chart of diagnoses of family members, and state how much they smoke, how long they have smoked, and how much and how often they drink alcohol. They must complete charts of Digitek or Lanoxin pills usage. And, plaintiffs must submit job records including pensions and insurance and disclose all workers compensation claims, disability claims and personal injury lawsuits.

To date, more than 100 Digitek lawsuits have been transferred to U.S. District Judge Joseph Goodwin, and more are expected to be added.

SOURCE: Digitek Recall › Those suing for Digitek injury must fill out lengthy fact sheets

Some of the products, such as Dextroamphetamine Sulfate generally prescribed for narcolepsy and attention deficit disorder with hyperactivity, fell under an earlier recall due to defects such as oversized tablets delivering higher than labeled doses of medication. The expanded recall is to ensure that all defective products have been removed from the market.

Oversized tablets also plagued U.S. generic pharmaceutical group Actavis Totowa LLC, which recalled batches of Digitek last April.  Digitek is commonly used in the treatment of various heart conditions.

ETHEX has recall notifications to wholesalers for several drugs and to pharmacy retailers for Hydromophone HCI and Metoprolol Succinate only. Hydromophone HCI is a analgesic drug from the opioid class drug often used as an alternative to morphine. Metoprolol Succinate is a medication used to treat several conditions related to the heart and blood vessels. A complete listing of medications recalled is available from the FDA.

Patients who have any of these medications in their possession are advised to continue taking them in accordance to their prescriptions, as suddenly stopping them could put patients at risk. Patients also should contact their health care provider if they experience any problems or have questions about their prescriptions.

Any wholesale or retail customer inquiries related to this action should be addressed to ETHEX Customer Service at 1-800-748-1472, faxed to ETHEX Customer Service at 314-646-3788, or e-mailed to customer-service@ethex.com. Representatives are available Monday through Friday, 8 am to 5 pm CST.

SOURCE: Digitek Recall › ETHEX expands voluntary recalls

The complaint further states the FDA letter, written in Aug. 2006, advised defendants they were promoting drugs “without proper clearance” and possibly more than 26 adverse drug experiences went unreported.

The updated FDA letter in February 2007 states, “Significant deficiencies were found in the operations of your firm’s quality control unit, and as a result there is no assurance that many drug products manufactured and released into interstate commerce by your firm have the identity, strength, quality and purity that they purport to possess.”

In April of 2008, Digitek‘s manufactures issued a recall because the pills contained twice the amount of the active ingredient.  In response to recall, the plaintiff argues, “Defendants placed tens of thousands of patients, including Decedent, unnecessarily at risk of serious injury and/or death and may have caused them to suffer personal injuries and harm, including medical expenses, anxiety and fear induced from ingesting the defective and misbranded drug.”

In the Digitek lawsuit, Butts filed the following charges: “violation of the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act, strict product liability including design and manufacturing defects, failure to warn, breach of express and implied warranty, negligence, fraud, negligence per se, and negligent misrepresentation.”

Butts is also desiring “damages for pecuniary losses, all hospital, medical and funeral expenses, loss of advice and counsel, loss of spouse’s services and parent’s services, mental anguish, loss of companionship and society, and loss of inheritance.”

SOURCE: Digitek Recall › Texas woman sues Digitek manufacturer for husband’s death

Chandler’s wife Barbara Chandler deems the defendants negligent because Digitek was distributed to the public with twice the amount of the active ingredient, according to the West Virginia Record.

The paper reports, “Digitek (Digozin) has a narrow therapeutic index and has a limited margin between effectiveness and toxicity. Chandler, as administratix of the estate is seeking judgment, jointly and severly, (sic.) from all defendants, pre and post judgment interest and costs.”

SOURCE: Digitek Recall › Alabama man dies after consuming Digitek

According to the Philadelphia Inquirer, the agreement says Actavis cannot resume its practices until it conforms to “the agency’s good manufacturing practice.” Actavis must improve its labs, facilities, and equipment.

Actavis has faced numerous lawsuits over the recalled drug Digitek. One such lawsuit includes the death of a patient and claims that Digitek is an unsafe and flawed drug.

Actavis would not comment if the FDA agreement had influenced the Digitek lawsuits or not.

SOURCE: Digitek Recall › Actavis N.J. plant agrees with FDA

In April of this year, Digitek pills were recalled due to a suspicion of Digitek pills containing twice the active ingredient. Actavis Inc., the drug manufacturer, believes none of these pills made it to the public and that the recall was only out of “an abundance of caution.”

Unfortunately, many Digitek consumers are still unaware of the Digitek recall and the number of reported deaths associated with Digitek consumers. The FDA posted a Med Watch Alert for Digitek on April 28, 2008 due to the possibility of some of the pills containing double the active ingredient.

Health experts believe the FDA should have further investigated Digitek’s manufacturers and the FDA should have warned doctors, pharmacists, and consumers of the potential dangers associated with this drug. The FDA believes their actions in informing the public were consistent when compared to other drugs that have caused issues.

SOURCE: Digitek Recall › Digitek believed responsible for 667 deaths

Dingell and Stupak’s letter questions not only the FDA’s inspection of the company’s facilities, but if the FDA should have allowed this company to resume its operation, even though it has a history of recalls.

According to PharmTech, Congress wants the FDA to provide documents “on all FDA-regulated products that Acatavis received approval to sell in the United States since January 1, 2003.”

At the end of July, Actavis Totowa decided to voluntarily recall “the retail level of all drug products manufactured at its Little Falls, New Jersey, facility.” This recall took place after the FDA conducted an inspection of the company in April when Digitek was recalled because the pills were double in “the appropriate thickness.” In this third recall, the recalled pills are believed to have contained twice the correct amount of medication.

Digitek is not the only product that Actavis has recalled; in March, Actavis South Atlantic LLC recalled U.S-sold fentanyl transdermal system CII patches. They may have “a fold-over defect,” which may leak fentanyl gel.

The Actavis Group is not only the producer of Digitek but also many other products. According to Actavis’ website, Actavis is “one of the world’s leading players in first-class generic pharmaceuticals.” We will see just how much longer this statement remains to be true.

SOURCE: Digitek Recall › Congress investigates FDA inspection of Actavis

Sales for Lannett’s digoxin, a generic form of Digitek, still have been strong since the recall of Digitek in April of this year.

Because digoxin was not recalled, this company has been able to maintain a good financial report for the fourth quarter of the fiscal 2008 year. Especially after the Digitek recall, the company continues to work with the FDA to guarantee a safe and immense supply of this product.

Established in 1942, Lannett Company, distributing generic products for various symptoms, is a popular leader in the pharmaceutical industry. Lanett sells its products to drug wholesalers, retail drug chains, repackagers, distributors, and government agencies.

Digoxin has proven to be a safe and popular alternative to the recalled Digitek.

SOURCE: Digitek Recall › Generic drug maker reaps benefits of Digitek recall

Across the United States, around sixty Digitek recall law suits have been filed in federal courts. The defendants include the following: Actavis Totowa, LLC, Actavis, Inc., Actavis Elizabeth, LLC, Actavis US, Mylan, Inc., Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Mylan Laboratories, Inc., Mylan Bertek Pharmaceuticals and UDL Laboratories, Inc.

Collective cases will be transferred to Judge Joseph R. Goodwin.

According to the news report, under federal court procedures, the purposes of transferring all cases to one judge for pretrial rulings eliminates duplicative discovery and inconsistent pretrial rulings. Unlike a “class action,” where all suit are tried together, the MDL relates to pre-trial actions only. If a resolution or settlement is not reached, the cases go back to their respective districts for trial.

SOURCE: Digitek Recall › MDL consolidates Digitek recall cases

Doctors prescribe the drug, Digitek, to treat heart failure and abnormal heart rhythms.

Actavis Totowa, a Totowa, N.J., manufacturer, recalled Digitek after consulting with the Food and Drug Administration. Actavis makes Digitek for Mylan Pharmaceuticals of Pittsburg, Pa.

Actavis counsel John LaRocca said the company recalled Digitek after at least one pill emerged from the manufacturing process at double the appropriate thickness. An FDA statement said: “These tablets may contain twice the approved level of active ingredient than is appropriate.”

Double-strength tablets could lead to toxic levels of digitalis in patients with renal failure.

“We had some concerns about the process,” LaRocca said. He said the company knew of no deaths linked to Digitek use but Actavis and the FDA had received 11 complaints about side effects since 2006.

Actavis has asked pharmacists to instruct consumers to return all unused Digitek pills and to consult their physicians. While recalls often result in the removal of drugs from pharmacy shelves, consumers seldom receive personal notification.

At North Shore Pharmacy in Huntington, supervising pharmacist Ron Wood said, “We never keep the generic [Digitek] in stock, so it [the recall] doesn’t apply.”

Joel Bassuk, pharmacist at Raindew Pharmacy in Manhasset, said he received the recall notice yesterday but he only has about five customers who use the drug.

“They said to immediately examine your inventory and discontinue all lots,” Bassuk said, noting he has had no reports of adverse side effects.

CVS spokesman Mike DeAngelis said the chain had removed all Digitek from its stores. “We went back to see which patients had prescriptions over the past 12 months and contacted them,” DeAngelis said.

SOURCE: Newsday

SOURCE: Digitek Recall › Pharmacists will call: Digitek recalled